Buses over F-16s: India and Pakistan
Published by Talula April 17th, 2005 in politics, war
I heard on NPR about ten days ago that a bus between Pakistan and India was going to start running again, despite the danger of transporting people through the Kashmir. The program aired the stories of people who hadn’t seen their relatives for years, and were willing to stay with the police (a security measure) until the departure of the bus and risk the dangers of the trip. On the 8th, NPR posted this quote from an encouraging article about the bus (full broadcast):
Two buses defied attacks by militants and traveled through Kashmir Thursday, restoring a service closed for nearly 60 years by tensions between India and Pakistan. Families wept as they were reunited with relatives for the first time in decades.
Yesterday I read in the New York Times that Lockheed Martin is going to sell F-16s to Pakistan, and immediately after the announcement was made, Bush called India to tell the government there that the US will sell them to India as well.
The article details the slowing of production for that aircraft at the LM plant, and explains that not only would it create jobs here in the US, and prevent massive layoffs, but because of the way Pakistan wants to work out the deal, it would create jobs there as well. Peace, evidently, doesn’t pay the rent.
I don’t really know much about the relationship between the two countries, but it was interesting to read the different takes on the situation. The New York Times make a point out of the way the US offered the same arms to India immediately after agreeing to sell them to Pakistan, and it had a more suspicious tone than the Washington Post. The latter actually did not emphasize the critics of the sale at all–the article mentions critics who point out that the war industry is simply profiting off an an arms race, but that’s it. Al Jazeera of course had a different tone from both of them. It might be interesting to check out the site for the Hindustan Times that I’ve never seen before.
I heard the stories out of order, apparently, because I thought that the announcement to sell arms to Pakistan took place after the bus reopening. But the articles on the arms sales are dated near the end of March. Originally, I conceived of this post as a protest against Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and any other arms manufacturers profiting by engendering further animosity between the two countries, particularly right after such a poignant symbol of hope: the bus though Kashmir. But after doing some research and realizing the timing was actually the opposite, maybe I can spin this in a positive light–that the desire for peace is strong enough to overcome the fear of violence.



Timely post Talula!
Looking over the news today, google news leads with a new NYTimes arcticle, “Pakistan and India Show New Signs of Reconciliation” and links to related entries.
Talks went well according to radio Australia, “The two leaders agreed to boost road and rail links and revive a panel to promote trade, after watching the final match of a cricket series by their national teams.” This, even though, “play was briefly stopped when frustrated Indian spectators threw water bottles at the Pakistani players”
Also, the Calcutta Telegraph reports that Musharraf and Singh also spoke of starting, “railway service between Khokrapar in Rajasthan and Munabao in Sind” and that India initiated and Pakistan affirmed the importance in Kashmir of “greater people- to-people contact and turning the Line of Control into a soft border.”
I like how the Telegraph reporter enlivens the following section, I can almost imagine the politicians standing up and dancing…
Here you can see a picture of the leaders holding/shaking hands.
I really like how you told us the order you heard things in, and the effect your discoveries had on your thinking. That’s totally fascinating to me.
I have to say, maybe it’s just the cricket, but I haven’t felt this hopeful about things in a long time.